Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Khan (Pakistan)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Natasha Khan (Pakistan)

Natasha Khan (Pakistan) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

A musician without an album (yet to be released), with an article that seems more like an advertisement than an encyclopedic entry. Jmlk17 05:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete-I don't think the article sounds advertisement-ish, but its sources certainly needs some improvement. Its improper use of sources should certainly be highlighted upon; it cites YouTube as a source (see WP:YOUTUBE and WP:COPY). Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 08:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete definitely not a speedy candidate, as it claims the single charted. Lacks sources that would establish notability. 11 ghits for "Natasha Khan" +aag, none of which are usable, had to do it that way as there's another singer with the same name who is notable. I'm somewhat concerned that the subject may have enough coverage in another language to pass though. Horrorshowj (talk) 09:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong delete - non-notable singer; more advert than article, but that would have been curable. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails criteria of WP:MUSIC. Haven't released any full-length album. No reliable and verifiable sources per WP:RS & WP:V. May be notable after success of first album, but not now. Visor (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.