Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie choquette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, I guess. No real discussion about the deletion since the copyvio was identified. If someone writes an original article, or this one gets kept at wp:cp, feel free to nominate it again (if you feel like it). - Bobet 21:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Natalie choquette

None of the information in this article is sourced, and although there is a small claim to notability, none of it is verified. Also note: the article's sole contributor is a possible single purpose account. MonkBirdDuke 19:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - This one's a toughie. The artist is certainly notable per our guidelines, but the article seems to exist for publicity purposes (based on the prime editor's comments on the talk page). I'm also concerned about how closely the article resembles the artist's biography posted on her official website (the French one, I couldn't open the English version). I would appreciate it if someone with a better command of French took a look at the two to make sure we are not stealing material. That issue aside, we have a notable individual who's bio needs significant clean up, but not deletion. -bobby 20:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Tag as copyvio and close. Notable enough, but still a copyvio so tagging it until it gets resolved. ColourBurst 21:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.