Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasheim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Luigi30 (Ταλκ) 02:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nasheim

I'm creating the AfD page for User:130.240.217.169, who insists on speedy deletion, but that is not appropriate. His/her reasoning follows. I abstain from voting. Enochlau 01:36, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Quoted from 130.240.217.169:

The given reason is: 1) Delete because this band does NOT conform to the Wikipedia guidelines on music groups. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:MUSIC. This is a small demo band that does not fulfill any of the listed requirements for inclusion, and thus should not have any place here. 2) Delete because the pictures (excepting the album cover which is a complete fake) are used without permission, violating my copyrights. All the info here is wrong; this can be verified by going to the official website linked -- www.nasheim.se. This is a silly personal "Internet war" type thing, and Wikipedia should not serve as a playground. This should not be "wikified", this should not be "verified", this should be DELETED. It is 100% disinformation and does not even belong on Wikipedia in the first place. There is NOTHING to discuss here. DELETE.

• Delete per User:130.240.217.169 not speedy, though. Mark Image:Eriksmiley.jpg as a possible copy-vio. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 01:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete the user's last comment does qualify it for speedy - if it's an attack page then that is in fact on of the WP:CSD --Bachrach44 02:09, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but not in its current form. Nasheim are a real band but this is a blatantly false entry. I'll write a proper entry now. rob 02:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

comment Even if they're rewritten (which would make no longer a speedy delete), they still have to be notable based on WP:music to warrant a WP entry. --Bachrach44 03:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete just because I'm not sure if the anon IP nominator was acting in good faith or not. The band also doesn't seem to be overly notable, with not being signed to a major label, only having 1 album (not the 2 recommended), no hits, and generally not being notable. If it is an attack page, then it should be speedy deleted, but I can't tell if it really is. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 04:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

If you're not sure whether the anon acted in good faith, then assume he did per WP:AGF and don't vote delete based on that. - Mgm|^(talk) 16:53, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

comment They are signed to a major label in the context of metal music though - Katatonia were on Northern Silence, and they're pretty huge, as are Mercyful Fate. rob 05:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, as it stands. If the article's improved and evidence of meeting the music guidelines provided I'll change my vote. Just because bands are Swedish doesn't mean they're not notable but we need to know more about their audience size etc. The Land 16:43, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Then why is the anon claiming their image copyright is violated? - Mgm|^(talk) 16:53, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, for no other reason than non-notability/vanity. Ifnord 18:45, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.