Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 01:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Narg

I am pretty sure thwartment is not even a word. --Infrangible 02:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, nonsense. No salvageable material.--Cúchullain ^t/c 02:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing verifiable I could find (WP:V). The first just seems to be something made up one day; the second I can't find any sources for; the third seems too minor to merit an article, if it is indeed turue. Crystallina 02:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. nonsense —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SYSS Mouse (talk • contribs) 03:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
  • • Delete. I am also not sure thwartment is a word, nor is anything else on the page remarkable. (Personally, I thought Narg was what the Brain said.) — CJewell (talk to me) 03:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Nonsense article--$UIT 05:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• strong delete unsourced & nonsense & unnotable --Iyenweyel 12:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Unsourced and non-notable neologism. (aeropagitica) 15:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Trash. Down the -atory with it. Anthony Appleyard 15:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. For the record, though, I understand 'thwartment'- so it must be a word, right? Maybe it wasn't a word yesterday, but it is now. It's the best thing about this article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.