Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napoleon Dynamite (character)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Napoleon Dynamite (character)

Napoleon Dynamite (character) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Copy-paste job from the main article Napoleon Dynamite. Except for some very minor formatting changes this is essentially taken word-for-word from the "Characters" section of that article. Additionally it's been tagged for cleanup since March with no help. Nothing to merge here as the text is already identical, no need for a redirect as it's an unlikely search term and only one incoming link aside from the parent article. Arkyan • (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom.--Ispy1981 22:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete redundant Rackabello 22:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Philippe 23:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom & per WP:FICT. Carlossuarez46 16:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. If it had additional/different information, it may have been interesting, but I agree with the nomination; it's unnecessary. María (habla conmigo) 12:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete because this is a fictional character from a single film. Real-world context for this character can be established on the film article itself. Preserve nothing; it's basically personal observations from the film itself. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to film article. It's not like that character is popular to the extent that professional analysis on the character has been performed and published.--Kylohk 16:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Jac roe 20:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It isn't good enough for a delete. If you could choke an article, that would be good enough. -_-. Toasty! | Available at your local store 23:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.