Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Lynch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 11:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Naomi Lynch

Naomi Lynch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Subject of article does not meet notability guidelines of WP:MUSIC Nv8200p talk 16:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - no evidence of notability; a link to her MySpace does not constitute adequate sourcing. No demonstration of coverage by external independent sources. Walton monarchist89 17:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - what the last guy said. Nardman1 17:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - no credibles sources. Monni 17:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep or Strong merge redirect to Buffalo G Under the premise that it does no harm to keep. She is 1/2 of a marginally notable duo. The Buffalo G article is weakly sourced, but gets 19,000 g-hits so it appears that they were noticed. I think that there would be little confusion with the redirect, as the article is short and she is prominently mentioned. --Kevin Murray 21:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Well.... I would support merging, but verifiability is still an issue. If people can come up with credible sources and add them, then it's OK for me. Monni 20:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:MUSIC on all counts and beyond that the only other claim is other members of the family are famous. Nuttah68 09:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no evidence of hits anywhere. Search for Buffalo G scores a blank in IRMA website. No evidence of passing WP:BIO or WP:MUS. No sources. Ohconfucius 05:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.