Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nantwich Town F.C. 2007-08 season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nantwich Town F.C. 2007-08 season

Nantwich Town F.C. 2007-08 season (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I don't believe an article about one season in a Unibond League team's history is that notable. PeeJay 13:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

• Die. or rename to Nantwich Town F.C. and expand to full history of team. The page, if you read it, seems to include quite some detail. It is probably not notable however- I live in england and have heard neither of Nantwich Town F.C. or of the Unibond League. Jake the Editor Man 13:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comments

• 1. An article on Nantwich Town F.C. already exists and already contains a history section.
• 2. I'm guessing you don't follow football, as the Unibond League is one of the most notable semi-professional football leagues in the country.
• 3. Nantwich Town is a very significant non-league football club, having won the FA Vase last year ChrisTheDude 20:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

• Having said that, I believe this is excessive detail for a club at this level, so delete ChrisTheDude 20:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Malcolmxl5 14:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The football club already has its own article, which is fair enough, but this does not belong in an encyclopedia.--Michig 14:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - Just so we're clear, I'm not against all clubs having individual season articles. I just don't think clubs like Nantwich should have them, because Nantwich Town F.C. is barely notable as a club in the first place. - PeeJay 14:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - I'm surprised that anyone living in England and having some interest in football would be unaware of the Unibond league, but that doesn't mean teams in that league should get season-by-season articles. Merging to the club's article would invite expansion to an unworkable size, and we'd be back with a string of deletion arguments again. Best not to go down that road. BPMullins | Talk 14:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I am unhappy about professional clubs having season-by-season articles, but to have one for a semi-professional club four divisions below the Football League is quite pointless. Number 57 17:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for all the reasons given above. If the club achieves something notable in the present season (relatively likely, I would say, given that they won the FA Vase not long ago), it can be written into their main article, rather than this one. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as being far too non-notable. Qwghlm 22:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.