Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanooze (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nanooze

Nanooze (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

no references to prove vague assertion of notability cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 01:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Original contribution ([1]) was by an account conveniently named Nanooze. Little or no improvement since then. —BradV 01:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:WEB. Couldn't find any reliable online sources for the site. Also, website has an alexa ranking of almost a million. ~EdGl 02:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless notability is demonstrated through reliable sources. Terraxos (talk) 03:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - blatant advertising of an unnotable site Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 03:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I couldn't find any reliable sources, and it seems like blatant advertising. -=Elfin=-³⁴¹ 04:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB and blatant advertising. Gary King (talk) 16:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and salt. fails WP:WEB is an advertisement created by a single purpose account Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails WP:WEB. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.