Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Hayfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus to delete. Peacent 03:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nancy Hayfield

Nancy Hayfield (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Probably written about self or by close relative, creator no longer member of wikipedia, unclear how important subject is, doesn't meet WP:BIO guidelines, does not link to many articles within wikipedia. has been proposed to be deleted before. Eliz81 16:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Does not meet the criteria for authors in WP:BIO Plm209^{(talk to me • contribs)} 17:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, 2 novels published by major publishers, co-author of computer books currently in print. NawlinWiki 16:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 21:05, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:BIO. Stellatomailing 03:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Nothing in WP:BIO for Creative Professionals coincides with this author for notability. --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 14:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Peacent 14:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep, editor in chief of a well known magazine, and her earlier novels are mentioned in major newspapers.[1] John Vandenberg 14:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep as noted above. COI is not relevant for deleting, but a Google test or other way to verify would be. Bearian 20:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• DeleteWeak keep not notable. she appears only to be an editor, rather than an author. Cleaning House ranks in the 5.33 millionsths. [Edit: However, as pointed out by User:Jayvdb, reviews of said poor seller would nonetheless satisfy WP:BIO, although not all the links relate to her.] Ohconfucius 07:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. As per nom. She may be an editor, but she doesn't have enough Sources to meet the requirements of WP:BIO and WP:BLP.--Edtropolis 13:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and fix., per Vandenberg.
• delete - no secondary sources given, and I can't imagine there would be that much written about her to satisfy sourcing requirements. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 02:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.