Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nag Nag Nag

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus, which defaults to keep. However, there is some confusion here. This isn't an article about a nightclub. It is an article about one particular evening's festivies that happen to happen at a club. A club Night. The Club itself, as pointed out below, doesn't have an article. Without references and other improvements, and with more clarity, I would support a renomination in 4-6 weeks. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nag Nag Nag

Nag Nag Nag (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Hard to see how in the world this is notable. No notability asserted. No WP:RS presented. And what's with that photo? This should have been deleted long ago. Qworty (talk) 07:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Strong delete Spam. Not notable. Alchemy12 (talk) 08:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong keep. Definitely notable club night. Perhaps other editors are not the most familiar with the subcultures in question. Have seen multiple references in NME, The Face, Dazed & Confused, Attitude, i-D, and that's just from memory, among others. Presently at work, but i will find and add sources later. The picture is a nonsense and should go. Unless this is all an April Fool's joke in which case, kudos, you got me. tomasz. 10:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, it appears in several travel guides to London and various news articles. Blast Ulna (talk) 07:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Source source source so we can keep keep keep. Links in above comments should be included in the article in order to save it. Without them, this would be an easy "delete" call. B.Wind (talk) 03:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Can night clubs even be notable? –thedemonhog talk • edits 16:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:HEY. I'd close the debate, but I want to see what others say. Bearian (talk) 19:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as failing WP:V. Once an irrelevant reference, and even more irrelevant image, have been removed nothing that is left is sourced. Yes there are sources available but I am not able to assess them since they are mostly behind paywalls. However, they do not seem particularly in depth. If the night is notable surely the club is more so. A page on the club might be a better way forward. TerriersFan (talk) 20:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.