Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadim Dawod
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nadim Dawod
Non-notable kingpin/trafficker/rapper. 2 ghits, 0 articles. Article fails WP:V, WP:RS. CSD was declined. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. {{nn-bio}}. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: I tried that exact CSD, but it was declined. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Apparently whoever declined didn't read that the "critically acclaimed" album wasn't sourced as being "critically acclaimed" Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Nowhere in the speedy delete criteria does it say that the indication of importance/significance has to be sourced. Guest9999 (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that declining was the correct thing to do. The claim of notability is there, so prod or AfD are the way to go.--Fabrictramp (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Apparently whoever declined didn't read that the "critically acclaimed" album wasn't sourced as being "critically acclaimed" Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:MUSIC Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No sources in article to back up notability claims, gsearch isn't coming up with notability.--Fabrictramp (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. NN Dreamspy (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NN. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 01:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.