Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadiah evans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 09:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nadiah evans

Non-notable, all advertisement, page created by the subject herself. Special-T 02:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Ditto. In addition Nadiah evans has spammed links to her userpage and her newly created autobiography in existing articles: once on Medium infantry, five times on 1971.
    --JKeene 02:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This article is clearly conflict of interest. The editor has written an article about herself. --Siva1979Talk to me 03:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No assertion of notability. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Can the page be kept if all references to outside websites were deleted? This posting was simply copied and pasted to this site. Poster is unfamiliar with site and needs help with what makes a good article. The album credits already contained featured websites, but have been removed. Is it o.k. now?
Nadiah evans (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
  • Article violates policies in WP:NOT, WP:SOAP, WP:COI, Wikipedia:Autobiography - Wikipedia is not for self-promotion, original research, autobiography, or dissemination of information that would constitute a conflict of interest. There are also issues of notability. - Special-T 16:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep as it asserts notability, although it needs verification. It clearly has a conflict of interest issue and is probably an autobiography, but I'll assume good faith and will not bite a newbie. Much of the problem is moot, as the userpage has an exact copy of the article, and the history log still exists, so it has been saved just in case. I have a different issue: some unregistered user keeps vandalizing the article. What can be done? I am not yet an administrator. Bearian 16:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Recording a CD and playing club dates does not qualify as an assertion of notability. The unregistered user editing that page appears to clearly be Ms. Evans herself editing from an IP address. I think we're all assuming good faith here, but this article and its subject are clearly not encyclopedia material. It should have been speedied, but someone opposed that, so we're going through the Afd process instead. - Special-T 18:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh I see.... Bearian 19:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Blatant self-promotion. Should have been speedied. Realkyhick 18:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as self-promotion and failing WP:MUSIC; that calls for two records on an established label, multiple non-trivial references, national or international touring, major awards - I see none of that here. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete CD is self released not label released.25 ghits, no gnews hits. No assertion or evidence of a far reaching tour. WP:COI issues. Horrorshowj 20:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.