Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadev Rozenfield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, bad faith nomination by banned user: see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DogJesterExtra. Part Deux 21:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nadev Rozenfield

Nadev Rozenfield (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

fails WP:BIO; lacks notability Shopstermax 04:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep appears to satisfy WP:BIO per this line: Sportspeople/athletes/competitors who have played in a fully professional league... .--Wildnox(talk) 04:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment Professional wrestlers are entertainers, not athletes. Respectfully, by your logic, every single professional wrestler (of which there have been over 50,000), deserve Wikipedia articles.Shopstermax 04:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
And there are even more professionals in other sports(yes I realize this is staged, but I still think in many ways it is an athletic event). Unless the guideline changes or I missed something, this person does not fail WP:BIO as you assert. --Wildnox(talk) 05:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. After looking at the edit history, something seems fishy because there are two editors who have no talk page and have edited most of the page. It seems that whoever wrote this wrote it about himself (against WP:AUTOBIO). → JARED (t)  20:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete not notable wrestlerDogJesterExtra 16:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment Please note that creator is under investigation for being a WP:SOCK account of User:JB196 and if proven, the AFD will be Speedily deleted as a Keep (with no prejudice against renomination) See section on WP:AN/I for more details. SirFozzie 20:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.