Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N degrees of separation

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 00:51 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:N degrees of separation

Pointless page that sees no activity whatsoever and doesn't do anything but sit there and take up massive amounts of system resources... Jaberwocky6669 July 1, 2005 10:05 (UTC)

• Oh yeah and delete Jaberwocky6669 July 1, 2005 10:16 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. I'm a little confused at Jaberwocky6669's strong lobby for this page's deletion despite his frequent participation. What's wrong with having a little fun associated with our great community? I disagree that this consumes a prohibitive amount of system resources. It is in the Wikipedia: namespace, which is appropriate. I see no reason for its deletion. -Tadanisakari July 1, 2005 10:21 (UTC)
• COmment Frequent participation? I created the page... Jaberwocky6669 July 1, 2005 10:26 (UTC)
• Keep. It's rather good fun. I'm also not convinced that it uses massive amounts of system resources. Silverfish July 1, 2005 10:41 (UTC)
• Keep. Jaberwocky's on a one-man deletion crusade today, it seems. Almafeta 1 July 2005 12:25 (UTC)
• Delete - Not useful, interesting or notable. completely unencyclopaedic Adamn 1 July 2005 12:29 (UTC)
• Keep. - It actually looks more like an element for mapping out the maze of wiki links, finding dead ends, etc. that would serve a rather useful purpose. -- Natalinasmpf 1 July 2005 12:32 (UTC)

Oh yes, that is precisely the page's original intended purpose. Jaberwocky6669 July 1, 2005 12:37 (UTC)

• Allright yeah I stop. It just seems like WP has ground to a slow crawl and I am a lil' restless cause Im somewhat of a wikiholic and I dunno Jaberwocky6669 July 1, 2005 12:36 (UTC) Sorry
• Keep Let's not be stupid. siafu 1 July 2005 13:23 (UTC)
• P.S. and Imma big fat crybaby Jaberwocky6669 July 1, 2005 13:25 (UTC)
• PS I've gone absolutely bonkers, this applies to my 'real life' Jaberwocky6669 July 1, 2005 13:27 (UTC)
• Keep. Note that this is a pastime designed to provide light relief for Wikipedians, located in the Wikipedia: namespace. Thus, it does not need to be "encyclopedic". Whilst I don't want Wikipedia to become a general-purpose games site, this piece of encyclopedia-related fun appears to me to be completely harmless. -- Karada 1 July 2005 13:30 (UTC)
• Keep - because I think we're under attack from some evil empire that is trying to destroy the very foundations of Wikipedia. Yeah, yeah, it's the new software. Whatever. --Mothperson 1 July 2005 18:11 (UTC)
• Definitively keep this fun page. Karol July 1, 2005 23:52 (UTC)
• Delete, no encyclopedia development involved. See the WP:FUN VfD for further explanation. Gazpacho 2 July 2005 01:50 (UTC)
• Delete not encyclopedic (even if in the namespace). JamesBurns 2 July 2005 03:44 (UTC)
• Keep. A little fun helps once in a while. utcursch | talk July 2, 2005 07:48 (UTC)
• Delete being an avid gamer myself I know there are millions of other sites out there. Else try wikicities. This simply doesn't belong on wikimedia projects. Waerth 2 July 2005 12:10 (UTC)
• Keep. It's really fun. --Jyril July 2, 2005 15:13 (UTC)
• Strong delete. There are countless websites where we may have fun. Wikipedia does not need to be one of those. — Phil Welch 5 July 2005 03:39 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.