Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NZIST
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NZIST
Non-notable organization that fails the WP:ORG and WP:ADS criterias. Google only shows around 20 relevant results [1].--TBCΦtalk? 22:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as advertising spam. Article created by Single Purpose Account[2] belonging to webmaster/secretary of NZIST[3].Probably a decent-minded organization and a good faith article creation, but non-profits are subject to new stringent policy on spam as much as commercial companies Bwithh 00:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
We are an incorprorated organisation in New Zealand with around 300 active members established in 1996 - this is not spam advertising. It is purely informative for the history and progress of the organisation to be recorded. We have mainly been using our own listserv (nzist@stream.school.nz) to discuss technical and educational issues. I thought it was time for the group to be recorded permanently. Gil Hunter —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunterg (talk • contribs)
- Delete this Vanispamcruftisement per Bwithh. A google search shows 47 results, 22 of which are unique. I'm nominating the following pages in this walled garden as part of the same AfD:
-
- NZIST - New Zealand Information Science Teachers' Association
- Internet Control and Filtering
- Software Issues and Suggestions
- --Daniel Olsen 02:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per norm. If possible, this vote can be used for the entire garden. /Blaxthos 07:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Gerry Ashton 21:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.