Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NX class starship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Enterprise (NX-01), editors may wish to Merge any useful information into that article. BLACKKITE 15:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NX class starship

NX class starship (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fancruft that fails WP:V, WP:FICT, WP:NOT#PLOT and has in universe issues with WP:WAF. There are no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Basically you can throw the whole book at this one. Gavin Collins (talk) 16:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction & Fantasy-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 16:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to Enterprise (NX-01). --EEMIV (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • ...and merge recently cited material to Enterprise (NX-01) -- cited material refers to development of that, not the concept for the class as a whole. --EEMIV (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per nomination. Lack of true verifiability does it for me. Rudget. 16:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Major plot devices on a TV Series (Both NX class ships were in multiple episodes). At worse case, the article should be merged to Enterprise (NX-01) Fosnez (talk) 16:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep I concur with Fosnez's points. Can we use more secondary sources? How does one go about doing that? --Blue387 (talk) 07:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect: article appears to be original research; propose redirection to Enterprise (NX-01) as earlier suggested. Mh29255 (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to Enterprise (NX-01), with merge of any relevant, cited material.

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Collectonian (talk) 07:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

• Re-direct to Enterprise (NX-01), keep the history of the redirect, and merge anything if possible. Acalamari 18:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nothing to merge after policy-breaking content is removed. Doctorfluffy (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to Enterprise (NX-01). Perfectly valid alias for an existing article. - JasonAQuest (talk) 03:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep or at least Merge. I quite agree with Fosnez and Blue387 above. I see nothing wrong with the article, and it certainly doesn't appear to me to be original research. At the very least a merge into the Enterprise (NX-01) article in a sub-section on the NX class. This is core information from a major TV franchise; it is not self-indulgent fan material. Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 13:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.