Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NMDE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NMDE

I'm bringing this to AfD without a specific recommendation as I believe it needs wider community input. I have been unable to find anything about the NMDE through Google (and in edit summaries it was specified they do not have a website). This is basically the party's manifesto, so I believe it fails under original research. Perhaps the article could be edited down to remove the OR, but that wouldn't leave much and would need sources as its currently unverifiable. Note: though this organization's views are utterly abhorent please don't comment on the basis of the content Gwernol 16:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia should only attempt to include articles that are properly sourced. Please add sources to your article. Thanks. PJM 17:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unless properly sourced. PJM 17:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry wikipedians. This is my article and it really does fail under a lot of stuff i misunderstood. Feel free to delete it, i will take no offence. Will it be acceptable when they have a website up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagle89 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 May 2006

• speedy delete as per creators's request above, with no prejudice against creating a well sourced article with clear claims of notibility in the future. (if so, article title should be the expanded version, not the abbreviaton) MartinRe 17:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks MartinRe Eagle89 17:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Not that it changes my mind but i just found a post on the horst Wessel song under the name nmde on your site. Eagle89 18:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete website or no website, not notable Caveat lector 18:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Don't mean to sound personal, but it will never be notable unless someone writes about it. No offence intended. Eagle89 20:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Very true, but wikipedia is not that someone. Wikipedia only writes up what is already notable, it does not write up things so they can get notable. Regards, MartinRe 21:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.