The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Neıl☎ 10:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced for months. Non-notable. Unencyclopedic. Arbitrary collection of information. Mikeblas (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
delete unreferenced original research, no assertion of notability as a subject unto itselfBeeblbrox (talk) 00:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
delete, I agree with the nom. It's a good list, but it still needs references.--Sallicio 08:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.