Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFL Super Bowl History

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NFL Super Bowl History

NFL Super Bowl History (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

To me, clearly an unneeded and redundant article. I could be wrong; feel free to change my mind Tanthalas39 (talk) 05:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. It's redundant to List of Super Bowl champions. Perhaps could be reduced to a redirect to that article. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 05:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• contribs) 06:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I would imagine you are the author of the article. You just voted twice, and you changed my vote above to say 'needed'. I'd say this speaks for itself. Tanthalas39 (talk) 06:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Unnecessary fork. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Redundant. POV fork of Super Bowl. STORMTRACKER 94 13:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I can sympathize with Thegamingmaster, who has worked on this article and is now watching its almost certain deletion. Save your work to your hard drive, and note that while Wikipedia has "published" your article, not all of the publications stay here permanently. I encourage you to keep researching and writing. I suspect that you may be a fan who lives outside the United States. Anyway, there's an entire organization of us amateur writers who love pro football, which you can find at www.pfraforum.org (register a name to get on, no obligation or cost). When you look back on it, you'll see that this was not your best work, and that this consisted of three items (list of teams, won-lost records after 40 games, and "fun facts" from the 2000 game) that don't make for a good article. Mandsford (talk) 14:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, sources provided are not adequate, and any relevant info could be merged to other articles. Cirt (talk) 14:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC).
• I suppose you people are right, and this is just my first article. Thank you Mandsford, for helping me understand. Thegamingmaster (talk)

And yet, you still remove the AfD tag. It's pretty clear cut that the consensus is to remove it. Tanthalas39 (talk) 04:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I'll add that if I've written anything that's mean, I apologize. Don't let anyone's comments, mine included, stop you from contributing to Wikipedia. You have the same right to be here as any of us. Mandsford (talk) 16:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

*Thank you. :)

• Delete An obvious content fork. No redirect either--who's gonna search for "NFL Super Bowl History"? Blueboy96 14:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fork. -- Whpq (talk) 15:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.