Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFL: We Just Chillin'
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Almost patent nonsense. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 10:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NFL: We Just Chillin'
Clearly a joke (no Google hits). Wish there was a clear way to speedy this sort of thing. Daniel Case 06:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious. --Quarl 06:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - could an admin stretch the definition of an "attack page" so this could be speedied? B.Wind 06:44, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Who cares if its speedied? Its obviously getting deleted either way. --CastAStone 06:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Yes it's getting deleted, but don't you die a little inside having to actually discuss stuff like this? --Pboyd04 06:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete junk --Jaranda wat's sup 07:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for all the baove reasons. And speedy per WP:IAR if anyone feels brave. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Too bad it's too early to invoke the Snowball Clause, but, alas, it's only proposed policy. B.Wind 07:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Delete This article needs to be removed. The faster the better. Ajwebb 17:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for the reasons given above and because there is no "NFL" namespace. --Cyde Weys votetalk 18:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Unverifiable, non-notable, and abandoned by the original author in mid-sentence. --Metropolitan90 02:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
}