Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ND-001 Nadesico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Martian Successor Nadesico as completely unsourced and in violation of WP:FICT; such content should not be merged. Sandstein (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ND-001 Nadesico

ND-001 Nadesico (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable fancruft. SeizureDog (talk) 07:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable outside of the obscure anime series it appears in. Fails WP:FICTION. Lankiveil (talk) 11:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC).
• Merge into Martian Successor Nadesico I'm a fan of Martian Successor Nadesico and i take semi-offense on you calling it obscure (it aired on Cartoon Network fer chrissakes!) This article is about the main ship in the anime. I think the best thing is to merge it into the article about the series. Doc Strange (talk) 14:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete pure WP:OR and completely unreferenced. Excessive fancruft level detail of dubious factual accuracy. Collectonian (talk) 21:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

• Merge per Doc Strange, or redirect to the main series article 132.205.44.5 (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge or Redirect per Doc Strange. Information about main ship can not be deleted. Keep the history of page for save data. Zerokitsune (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge as per Doc Strange. Edward321 (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 12:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge per Doc Strange. Hiding T 12:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge per Doc Strange, or redirect. —Qit el-Remel (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Collectonian. Nothing redeeming, nothing to merge. Doctorfluffy (talk) 04:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.