Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N135CR

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 06:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] N135CR

N135CR (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Another helicopter tail number article. I see nothing notable or remarkable about this one (unlike some others, with notable crashes, etc.) Obviously, my preference is delete. Philippe 21:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete As a CSD A7: no assertion of notability. An extreme example of what violates Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Right up there with articles for all the license plate numbers of the vehicles in my town. Edison 14:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable helicopter.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete; this is only slightly more notable than an individual automobile. N396JS should probably go too. Zetawoof(ζ) 20:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's an honorable job, but this vehicle is not notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Notability must be attested to by second- or thid-party verifiable sources, which the page fails to do. - BillCJ 22:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - not notable. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 18:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - as for the article on N396JS - this does nothing to say why this particular helicopter is notable. If any third party sources can be found, it would probably be better to add them to the Eagle III article - as it would be probaly be easier to demonstrate notability for the operator rather than the aircraft - news sources are likley not to mention individual aircraft. Nigel Ish 18:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Helicopter N202LF currently has an AfD, interesting. Fails WP:N, I can't really see any reason to keep it. OSborn 19:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - CErtainly NN, and I do not think there is anything worth merging any 'parent' article. Peterkingiron 21:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - not a notable aircraft. -- Hawaiian717 21:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.