Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mzima

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mzima

Company vanity article. Fails WP:CORP. Prod tags were removed by original author without comment. Could also be copyvio since text is same as company web page. Rick Burns 15:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:VANITY and WP:CORP Hello32020 16:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I tried to improve the article. I think it's a big company, but as a private company it doesn't have to disclose the size of its operations. Perhaps somebody who works in the field could be asked about the company. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 18:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the above action would not satisfy WP:V Ohconfucius 06:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Not verifiably notable, nor is there an assertion of notability. -AED 21:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per AED. Alexa rank off the bottom of the scale (at 586 thousandsths). No evidence it passes WP:CORP. Ohconfucius 06:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.