Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Story Begins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 03:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My Story Begins

My Story Begins (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This series is yet to be released, first airing in February 2008. The article was created by Linleybrosllc (talk · contribs), presumably related to the production company. The only Google hit for +"Marco van Bergen" +"story begins" is this Wikipedia article. "Marco van Bergen" gets a lot more hits, but none of them appear to be the Marco van Bergen of this article. Vanispamcruftisement. Aecis^Brievenbus 01:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Google on "My Story Begins" LinleyBros OR "Marco van Bergen" OR "Martijn van de Velde" OR "Carré Albers" OR "Bart Volmer" OR "Andy Teerlink" gets 2 hits, Wikipedia and the other one. Lots of red-links. Good luck on the show though. Daniel Santos (talk) 08:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable in any way; the lack of sources is rather telling here. Could it be a hoax? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• delete - the crystal ball aspect of this home video project makes it unsuited for wikipedia. In addition, there do not appear to be any reliable sources to verify the notability. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

• do not Delete Yes. I know it's an encyclopedia. Yes. I know al the blah blah about deletion. But please dear people. Have a heart. Aecis. Did you liked it when I "Vandalized" your page? No. I did exactly the same thing as you did on my page. I placed a deletion tag. How does that feel? We are working very heart to create this series. I cite Aecis: Also, do not vandalise my userpage. Do you seriously think that you're gonna achieve anything with that? - My answer: No I don't. But I wanted to let you feel how it is when your page gets tagged by someone who thinks he's "Serious". Dear people. I'm 14 years old, And I'm trying to make a kick-ass series. Not that a stupid wikipedia article is gonna ruin it, but I can tell you that I have been spending the last FIVE MONTHS of my life on this project. Don't you think it's harsh to remove my blood and sweat? For Example: Aecis (wanna know why I'm continuously getting you: You seem to be the moderator of this nonsense) If you made a movie. And you're proud of it. And you want people to know about it. Then (if you have a heart) it feels very painfull when someone heartless deletes the thing YOU HAVE BEEN MAKING for the past few months. And I can assure you, IT IS NOT A HOAX.

BUT you can't get me on the references thing! I noted the official site and soon the official Season one companion book page will be online. I must stop now. Getting a little bit too depressive of this shit. But the last thing I'm gonna write about you, Aecis, is a cite of one of my best friends about YOU: "There are some out there who just love inflicting as much misery as they can on others. Wikipedia is filled with them. " But, if it has to be like this. I'll not lose my honor and delete the page myself. I think it's a shame for the community. Funny thing: That's what the whole series is about! LinleyBrosllc (talk) 23:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

the references need to be by other folks, not by you or the website for your project. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

It appears that you have misunderstood what Wikipedia is about. The subjects of Wikipedia articles need to be notable, encyclopedic and verifiable from reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a webspace provider, it is not a publisher of original thought, it is not a crystal ball, it is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion, and it is not a place to write about yourself or about projects you are involved in. I can understand that you care deeply about this subject, and I wish you all the best with the series, but it does appear that you have come to the wrong venue with this. Aecis^Brievenbus 00:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.