Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Mate Mick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g3, one of a long history of articles on nonexistent films by a sockpuppet of User:Nede. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My Mate Mick

My Mate Mick (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested PROD removed without comment. Current article lacks information as to why the subject is notable. Doesn't appear to pass WP:NFF --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 23:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete A search for "My Mate Mick" and the star turns up bupkis. Either a major crystal ball case or a hoax; either way, it fails to meet notability guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (talk) 01:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Written as Crystal and unless otherwise proved with substantial edits should go quickly.--VS ^talk 01:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete -- no evidence of notability. - Longhair\^talk 01:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Per reasons above. Earthbendingmaster 01:56, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, agree that it's either very crystalline, or very hoaxy. Fails WP:V, at any rate. Lankiveil ^{(complaints | disco)} 11:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.