Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Toothless Beauties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, though the article was expanded during the AfD and a relisting at this point would seem to have a good chance of resulting in a consensus to keep. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My Little Toothless Beauties

Non-notable rock album - only 4 other google hits. BlueValour 02:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete no context. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 02:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Context has been provided, but it needs expansion. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. --Shizane 02:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable album that is only sold at live shows of the marignally notable musician, Hawksley Workman. Not every album of a notable musician is notable. Ted (Talk) 03:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • That's not the standard, however. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. AdamBiswanger1 03:33, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keepalbums from notable artists. Typical standard is that the entire discography of an artist is included. --badlydrawnjeff talk 03:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• keep or merge as per above. Joeyramoney 04:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep and expand. If not, redirect to Hawksley Workman--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 05:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete for no context. The article is one sentence and a tracklist. That's not even worthy of being a stub. --Coredesat 05:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually, that's exactly what a stub would look like, and the context is there. I know nothing about the guy, so perhaps fans can chime in with more info. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Barely notable.--Auger Martel 06:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. It's perfectly worthy of being a stub - some of them have even less information than what this one has. fuzzy510 07:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Coredsat, and I don't hold Ghits as the final arbiter of notability. I am also unimpressed with the resume/advert for Hawksley Workman, full of hyperbole like "garnered critical acclaim" without citing sources. Tychocat 09:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nom. --Xyrael ^T 10:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per Tychocat. The Hawksley Workman needs some serious bias work, and reliable sources to establish some of the claims made. - Motor (talk) 11:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete musician promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. JChap 00:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. He probably sucks, but is on a major label and is notable, all of his albums should have lame stubs like this. The Hawksley Workman article needs work but not deletion (and what does that have to do with this anyway?). Recury 01:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete - The artist meets WP:MUSIC for notability easily, for touring, charting, and awards. However, to have an article for an album that seems to be little more than a promotional item, that is not available to the general public (couldn't find it on Amazon.com), and that is not released by an actual record label, is very questionable. If a review from a respectable magazine or website could be found, I would change my vote. --Joelmills 01:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. —Khoikhoi 03:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Updated this page with much content. This album is critical in understanding the development of this artist. --Superdifficult 13:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Album from notable artist, content has been updated. Rx StrangeLove 01:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the revised version. The original version was merely a track listing, now it's a real and valid album article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the revised version as a legitimate album article. Grandmasterka 17:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.