Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyHD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MyHD

Prod contested. Product of uncertain notability. No evidence of passing WP:CORP.Luna Santin 05:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Superficial description of HDTV capture card, no discussion as to notability.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  05:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per WP:NOR, WP:NN Ytny 08:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete according to WP:CORP. Article reads more like a technical advertisement than an encyclopedia entry. Scorpiondollprincess 13:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the immense number of hits in google seem to suggest this should pass WP:CORP, I don't know much about this thingamajig, but to me there seems to be some well organized technical information here that just needs to be formated. -MrFizyx 17:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I got the impression that the article was written as an advertisment, and it didn't feel encyclopædic to me. Martinp23 21:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and now Antares33712 23:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete corporate spam. JChap (talk • contribs) 00:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep 216.141.226.190 04:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. First page of Google hits were junk. KarenAnn 12:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean by junk? If the pages aren't related to the item discussed in the article in question I'd change to delete. -MrFizyx 20:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.