Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim urdu names u

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 07:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Muslim urdu names u

Muslim urdu names u (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Could become useful as part of a List of Urdu names, but there's nothing other than those beginning with U, which can't really stand alone. Not itching to delete, but may go that way. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Having found this previous AFD of several related articles, I'll go with delete. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 10:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Yup delete as per Jonathan Oldenbuck. X Marx The Spot (talk) 11:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above. --Non-dropframe (talk) 19:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom NN Dreamspy (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Transwiki to Wiktionary, then delete I looked at the debate that Oldnebuck cited on the other articles, and the final decision on that was "The result was delete. Will give a day or two to transwiki." Since it's determined that this information can be transwikied to Wiktionary, this should be treated accordingly. Anyone know how to "transwiki"? I'd do it if I knew how. Mandsford (talk) 23:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Yahel Guhan 02:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as above Avalon (talk) 14:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as above. Me what do u want? Your Hancock Please 17:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per this previous AFD of several related articles. And this one seems non-notable.--RyRy5 (talk) 03:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.