Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music referencing Bill Hicks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A bit fancrufty, and any worthwhile material can go in other articles if it isn't there already. Daniel Case 16:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Music referencing Bill Hicks

Music referencing Bill Hicks (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Laundry list of unrelated, bare-mention trivia. --Eyrian 11:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - WIkipedia is not a directory of loosely associated topics. Otto4711 12:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this is already covered well enough in the Legacy section of Hicks' own article. It's also baffling that the article doesn't mention SPA, which had a whole album loaded with Hicks references. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Interesting, but still trivia.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep or merge and redirect with Bill Hicks, but not necessary to delete. --164.107.222.23 17:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge anything sourced and non-trivial to Bill Hicks, the Hicks article is surprisingly compact given the notability of the subject. EliminatorJR ^Talk 18:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

• There isn't a single independently sourced item in the lot. There's nothing to merge. --Eyrian 18:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

• • • Verifiable, then. Though to be honest, the most notable items (Radiohead, Tool) are already in the target article. EliminatorJR ^Talk 21:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.