Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Grey's Anatomy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Music of Grey's Anatomy

Music of Grey's Anatomy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Delete - directory of loosely associated items. Per extensive precedent a list of every song that's played in an episode of a TV show is not encyclopedic. Similar lists for everything from Scrubs to House to The Office and a dozen more have been deleted. Otto4711 18:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Tiddly-Tom 18:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This is probably original research. They don't really have anything to do with the show other than having been sampled that one time. - Che Nuevara 19:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No references cited, so one can only assume that his was compiled by watching the episodes and noting the songs. That's original research. An encyclopedia article should cite other secondary sources. A Train^talk 20:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Per WP:OR. - Rjd0060 21:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Inappropriate on so many levels. Violates multiple clauses of WP:NOT as an indiscriminate collection of loosely associated bits of trivia. Wikipedia is not a discography resource. VanTucky ^Talk 22:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per precedent. Dannycali 03:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete While it seems some work went into this, it just isn't compatible with an encyclopedia. Perhaps this could be transwikied somewhere, but it is not for Wikipedia. Delete per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. --Phirazo 03:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, although I'm not a fan of the show, it is notable enough where our readers are likely to have an interest in this kind of information. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 15:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

• WP:INTERESTING is still not a reason for keeping the article. The notability of the show is not inherited by every aspect of the show. The nomination and the supporting comments have asserted policy-based objections to the article along with extensive precedent. Do you have any response to those policy-based objections? Otto4711 16:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Completely unreferenced, possible/probable OR. •97198 talk 12:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - All be unconventional, this article implies a invested interest for Greys Anatomy watchers. It may need cleaning up, but it's rare to find any list of sorts elsewhere on the net. -NP Needs to quote sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidok1 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.