Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 08:04, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Music history

Does not contain much information that is not duplicated in the main article History of music --Nlu 05:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Make it a redirect. -- Robert Weemeyer 05:59, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• History of music clearly states, twice, that music history is a distinct academic study. There is a lengthy discussion of the split on Talk:Music history. And, in any case, Wikipedia:duplicate articles is along the hall, three doors down. Uncle G 12:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Uncle G. --Allen3 ^talk 13:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Uncle G, although admittedly this article could use some expansion. For example, when did music history start being studied as an academic discipline? —Wahoofive (talk) 16:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, as above. Trollderella 16:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Perhaps stick a cleanup tag on it. --Jacquelyn Marie 17:57, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep -- JLaTondre 00:48, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.