Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music collecting strategies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any useful content could be merged into record collecting, but care should be taken to avoid the no how-to guide and no original research problems. KrakatoaKatie 03:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Music collecting strategies

Music collecting strategies (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Original research. The "references" are mostly examples rather than actual sources of information (including the author's own website). —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 00:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 00:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, will merge article skeleton into a new Record collecting#scope of collections section, after deletion. Jidanni (talk) 01:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Merge with record collecting sounds like an excellent idea. --76.205.25.141 (talk) 02:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a "how to" guide. B.Wind (talk) 02:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research, how-to guide. Nick Graves (talk) 03:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge into record collecting.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 06:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe transwiki to wikiversity. --Emesee (talk) 08:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete possibly transwiki to wikihow or wikiversity (i'm not too familiar with the latter project). Original Research that reads like a howto article. I'm rather strongly against merging this content. -Verdatum (talk) 17:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

So what would you write in a Record collecting#scope of collections section, or do music collections have no scope, no bounds, no limits? Jidanni (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Will the persons above who stated they find merging an acceptable solution please merge the one or two lines of the article that you find acceptable, and throw away the rest. Thank you. I cannot because I have a conflict of interest. Jidanni (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.