Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music Lives Beyond.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Resistance is futile! Mailer Diablo 09:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Music Lives Beyond.com

Non-notable website with an Alexa ranking below 6,500,000. Was prodded as such but prod removed by author without comment. ~ Matticus78 08:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete -- spam. - Longhair 08:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB. Dionyseus 09:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DarthVader 10:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Andeh 10:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Insightful, Music Fan and I prefer indie music and this web site introduces web users to more variety of new music, non of over played music -- AKA DONGER 03:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• The above comment is this user's only edit. ~ Matticus78 12:04, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This is the first site that I have been on that doesn't place a contract or limits of uploads on musicians -- Paris21 07:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• The above comment is this user's only edit. ~ Matticus78 12:04, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep When I logged onto this site I heard a variety on new music. As a fan I like the personal interaction with the artists and fans that this site offers. --Wmcrey 04:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• The above comment is this user's only edit. ~ Matticus78 19:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

• Keep Website provides a resourceful music tool that will allow fans to have access to songs and bands that they would not normally hear of. --Busterbust123 23:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• The above comment is this user's only edit. ~ Matticus78 11:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This web site is much needed in a world where music is over played and unoriginal. By searching this site I have found some real talent that is not the same thing I have listened to over and over again on local radio stations. --Poptart82 04:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• The above comment is this user's only edit. ~ Matticus78 11:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I like the ease of use of this website. I am not computer savvy and if I can understand what to do, then I know they had people like me in mind while developing this website. -- Jackson1 00:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. WP is not a web directory. I'm glad people like the titled website, it just doesn't need a WP article, and ease-of-use and having nice music doesn't create notability. Tychocat 14:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Obviously, this is spam. Moreover, with such a low Alexa ranking, this article is non-notable in itself as well. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 18:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.