Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muntinlupa Little League
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Neıl ☎ 11:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Muntinlupa Little League
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Unremarkable group. Hu12 (talk) 13:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hu12... I just wanted to mention that I was surprised by the sudden deletion. Since the initial notices from Wikipedia about concerns on the article we have been trying to find ways to improve. I thought that we had made some improvements. We were planning further additions to answer concerns. I was surprised by the sudden deletion. It would have been reasonable to have a couple of days warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.90.158 (talk) 14:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Debates on Articles for Deletion are generally scheduled for 5 days or longer. This is :intended both to provide time for multiple editors to review and discuss the article, and also for those editors who are so inclined to address concerns with the article to do so. Hu12 indicates that he/she believes the subject of the article to be non-notable. Are there sources or websites which might prove otherwise? If there are, please mention them here or add them to the article. It's possible that the little league is indeed notable, and that's fine - but, unless that can be shown here, it can't be verified, and the article may be deleted. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Ultraexactzz...
Thank you very much for your comments. I had seen the earlier concerns raised about my article. I am new to Wikipedia and have been struggling a bit with how it works. I have been studying carefully and hard how to improve the article so that it would meet Wikipedia standards. Today I had made several edits which I hoped would address some of these concerns. I was surprised to see that right in the middle of my latest edit the article was deleted. I think it would have been helpful to have a specific warning before deletion. I appreciate your comments and I will certainly use this in my future effort. Thank you. pepemunoz44
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pepemunoz44 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete Weak Keep. It lacks valid resources except for its Main Website. Also, I can't find ANY news report about this tournament except for this cached page from Manila Standard Today. Starczamora (talk) 19:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - I think it fails notability for a sports team. There's not really any references for the article. Now if they got farther in the Little League World Series, then I think they could be notable, but right now i say delete. Hatmatbbat10,a proud Wikipedian (Talk) 22:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. The different Little Leagues (LL) in the 2007 Little League World Series don't have articles, why should this be any different? --Howard the Duck 10:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
