Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multitorrent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete Nandesuka (talk) 03:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Multitorrent
non notable torrent search engine website Uni12 (talk) 07:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No references. Renee (talk) 14:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WEB. Dekisugi (talk) 14:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It's non notable and there are many torrent sites out there that do the same thing as this. Apex Glide (talk) 17:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Delete no references are provided as this is not notable, and fails WP:WEB - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete This is completely non-notable, per WP:WEB. Cannot find any notable mention of the website anywhere besides the fact that torrent sites typically result in a lot of search results. Gary King (talk) 07:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete Nah keep it. Theres quite a few torrent sites with pages on here. Why not this one?
- Do Not Delete Here it is mentioned: ghacks.net - Best Torrent Search Engines and www.ghack.net is an important website —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.58.194.69 (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete From discussion page of Multitorrent: The pirate bay, isoHunt, Mininova.... and others torrent sites have a wiki page under bittorrent websites category .... Is wikipedia a really free and democratic encyclopedia? This article describes a public service and was inserted under the right category.
- Do Not Delete From discussion page of Multitorrent: Exactly put it back up please admins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.180.8.199 (talk) 07:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.