Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multicultural weddings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Multicultural weddings

Multicultural weddings (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I can't see any way to improve this one. The bulk of it's just a difdef (and I believe an inaccurate one), whilst the remainder is totally incoherent ("More frequently the norm with royalty, invading military rulers and the usual migratory patterns of humans"). While the subject could (obviously) be sourced, I don't see how it could ever result in encyclopaedic content - at the end of the day, all it will ever say is "sometimes people marry people from other countries" - iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. It's written in a way which suggests that there might be something which can be added (i.e. it's not written as a straight-out dicdef), but I agree that there doesn't really seem to be anything. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I too do not see content worth keeping, but of course there could well be an article (or several) on the subject--there is certainly documentation to be found. To start, Films which feature multicultural weddings ? (smile) DGG 04:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Something tells me that kind of article would be gracing these august lists sooner or later, if the spate of nominations a few months ago of "List of films featuring [Esoteric feature]" is anything to go by. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 04:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. JuJube 06:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Topic could be encyclopedic but this revision is so far from being a worthwhile article that a complete rewrite is the way to go. --Richard 04:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.