Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammed Shareef
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Muhammed Shareef
Delete Seemingly non notable "scholar." Article does not establish notability nor can I really find anything which could bring this article to even coming close to WP:BIO. The only thing which I feel remotely establishes any notability is the founding of that institute. I think whether or not that's enough to keep Shareef enyclopedic is questionable eventhough I think that the institute may merit an article. Unfortunately, the institute's website says little to nothing about Shareef. Strothra 13:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep I've come across the Hausa language (I may even have read one of the translations about a number song) I am interested to know more and it is a real pity there is not more information on the article. 1500 documents is a fairly large collection. However my keep mostly is a "please lets have something in this area" rather than specifically on Shareef. One possibility is to rename and place under name of institute.
--Mike 21:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Kf4bdy talk contribs 02:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- STRONG KEEP, google variants on his name Muhammed Shareef, Mohammad Shareef, etc and you will see he is "real". And yes it is his insitute Sankore.org --Halaqah 12:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete good to know that he is real, but that doesn't mean that he is notable. The only sources so far appear to amount to his own publications. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of meeting WP:BIO. BlueValour 00:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.