Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mughda Chapekar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. >Radiant< 12:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mughda Chapekar

Mughda Chapekar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Single sentence + image gallery article that does not establish notability of subject and has been deleted thrice before. Should be deleted or merged with Dharti Ka Veer Yodha Prithviraj Chauhan. The article may even be a candidate for speedy deletion, in which case please feel free to close this nomination early. Finally, the images in the article are copyvios and should be speedied too. Abecedare 17:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

• Merge the text per nom. The pictures are invalid fair use at best, and have been nailed by Orphanbot. YechielMan 19:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and block recreation - This page was at one time a candidate for sppedy deletion, at which time it consisted of a single photo. It has sicne gained several more photos and two lines of text. I strongly suspect this to be a case of self-adveritsmetn by an actress. Whether or not she is natable, I cannot say, but the article does not provide evidence that she is. Furthermore what she has appeared in has a non-English title, so that I presume that what she has appeared in is a non-English TV programme or film. Peterkingiron 16:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sr13 05:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Since when is WP a photoalbum? Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 09:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• More precisely, since when was Wikipedia a gallery of fair use images? Delete. MER-C 05:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.