Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muggle Quidditch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. --Coredesat 05:57, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Muggle Quidditch

Muggle Quidditch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

no sources = nn Will (talk) 02:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. per nom. James Luftan contribs 02:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable game. Oysterguitarist 03:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fad that looks like it was recently invented. No sources. Non-notable.--Sethacus 03:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is close to "wikipedi is not for stuff made up in one school day". The Placebo Effect 14:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I have to say weak keep. It's not the most well-sourced topic in the world, but if Borders is willing to sponsor a Muggle Quidditch tournament in Phoenix, then there's hope for an article out of it. I think the creator(s) of the page should be given the chance to clean it up and expand the article first; otherwise, it can be merged with the existing Quidditch article. Sidatio 16:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable made-up "sport." (Some people really do have too much time on their hands.) Realkyhick 18:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - I found a Reuters article on it. Andjam 03:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Not made up, seems to be a legit offshoot of Harry Potter fandom. Wl219 09:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - not made up, as others have said. Maybe it should be merged, but it should not be deleted. Carcharoth 00:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. Some nerds become Wikipedians, some Muggle Quidditch players. :-) Bearian 16:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep article has good references. --Epaphroditus Ph. M. 15:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.