Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mudder

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mudder

This doesn't really belong in a encyclopedia Bobbis 21:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep,If this doesn't belong in an Encyclopedia, then neither does MUD, GNS Theory or anything that defines anything about roleplaying games. I vote it stays. -- Anonymous

• Delete, This doesn't really belong in a encyclopedia Bobbis 21:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, silly, unencyclopedic. Tempshill 22:08, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, any non-silly content could go in MUD anyway seglea 23:10, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, does not warrant its own article. Atari2600tim 02:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, childish unencyclopedic. Robotmannick 02:57, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or redir to MUD. User also created Mudders Eclipsed 17:35, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic, and supported by sockpuppets. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs) 12:38, 26 July 2005 (UTC)}
• Delete, the sock puppetry of Locke more or less proves it should go.

• Above vote by 66.161.20.231

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.