Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mud-blood.net
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 23:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mud-blood.net
Fansite, fails WP:WEB. Delete. JFW | T@lk 22:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
How do I fix it?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Typ2 (talk • contribs)
- Delete Is most def WP:NOT also not NPOV nor sourced esp since written by "I" and references his friends. Nothing rude meant at all just not wiki I think? Lsjzl 22:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Lsjzl.--Andeh 22:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Deleate it. I don't get it. Is thier no way to fix it. I can get someone else to write an article for it if you wish. Any straight answer Typ2 (talk · contribs)
- On the deletion notice on your page is this line "If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, join the discussion and consider editing the article so that the deletion policy does not apply." You may discuss here why it is suitable for this site or should remain even before a clean up begins. You can always voice your opinion here I have found! Hope this helps. Lsjzl 22:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with the site, and even the article can be improved, but Wikipedia does not need articles on every webpage. Please read WP:WEB. JFW | T@lk 22:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. As per Lsjzl. -- Evanx(tag?) 22:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -999 23:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
I understand that you do not need an article on every webpage.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Typ2 (talk • contribs)
How can I edit the article so that the deleation policy does not apply to it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Typ2 (talk • contribs)
- You have to read WP:WEB like Jfdwolff said, and in a sense show how the site fits with what websites are suitable for wikification. (ok ok not a real word) Lsjzl 22:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Would recieving the badge of Honor from the Potter police which is a well known Harry Potter webmaster help center be classifed as an award. I also put on thier that they have won awards from Spinnerend.Com for other things.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Typ2 (talk • contribs)
So is anyone can answer if the site awrds from potter poilce and spinnerend are acceptable. (Typ2 23:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC))
Can I ask why everyoen is saying delete and not comemnting to what I have said and asked please.{Typ2 00:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)}
-
- Comment The Potter Police (who don't look notable enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article themselves) give their badge of honor to anyone who basically passes their standards. [1] It's not like an award where only one wins, and there's nothing in their standards about "unique and orignal conent". I can't find any record of any site called "spinnerend.com". Fan1967 02:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- OK, i found spinnersend.com (helps if you get the name right) and it looks so unnoteable as to barely exist. Barely a few dozen google hits. Fan1967 02:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and protect, just in case. Wikipedia is not advertising space. Danny Lilithborne 01:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity. Typ2: No, they would not qualify as they are from fansites. In order to qualify it needs to be from a notable and reputable source, such as from a newspaper (National Newspaper, not the local paper) or maybe some kind of national association or something of that nature. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 01:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
