Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Fusion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge with flux capacitor. KrakatoaKatie 03:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mr. Fusion
Originally {{prod}}ded [1] citing "BTTF-cruft. Minutae from a feature film, not significantly notable to sustain an article."; subsequently removed by 63.88.50.33 (talk · contribs) w/o edit summary. Full disclosure: I originally {{prod}}ded the article.If WP:FICTION applies here, this doesn't even qualify as a "minor character". — pd_THOR | =/\= | 21:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and Merge with Back to the Future Trilogy or flux capacitor. It's notable in the context of the film as a final solution to the ever-present problem of how to power the time machine, a problem that plagued the characters throughout the series. -Amatulic 21:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. The inslusionist in me wants to keep this neat little article on a neat little bit of pop trivia from one of my fave popcorn movies series, but the pragmatist would be ok with a merge into flux capacitor if the community so agrees. youngamerican (yo) 01:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with flux capacitor as per Youngamerican. EVula 02:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep — The flux capacitor article itself is large enough to stand on its own. I would support a merge with an article about the technology in Back to the Future. That would be a place where the hover conversion could also be. Val42 18:40, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and/or Merge with flux capacitor as per everyone else. Ppk01 09:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with flux capacitor as per Youngamerican.--Tony 17:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.