Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Crack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mr. Crack

Mr. Crack (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

WP:BIO - crz crztalk 05:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

  • (edit conflict) Geez, nowadays you can't take a second to finish a nomination without someone else doing it for you :-) Assertion of notability not clear in the article. Article was speedied deleted under A7, but restored after suggestion of minor notability. Only notable reference appears to be this one. Published a book, "Mr. Crack", but official site can't be currently accessed. -- ReyBrujo 05:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Based on two blog entries [1][2], he seems like a local character but I'm still not seeing any evidence of notability. The article is still original research. "Sorry mum and dad, no crack for me today, I'm cutting down". -- IslaySolomon | talk 07:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Interesting guy, but NN. Gzkn 08:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable at all. Sr13 09:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Even though we all should be cutting down on our crack today! SkierRMH,12:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Undecided Google shows some blog coverage and such, but Google News Archive brings just a couple of very trivial mentions, not enough to qualify as realiable sources. If anybody can come up with a good source I'd probably keep this, but as it is it isn't verifiable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • No assertion of notability = speedy delete. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Authoring a book is an assertion. - crz crztalk 22:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as insufficiently sources and likely OR.-- danntm T C 22:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Interesting article, but not encyclopedia worthy. RichMac 23:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Anomo 02:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Interesting article, of probable local interest. 69.140.173.15 21:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.