The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.—Quarl(talk) 2006-12-26 15:17Z
Edit history of the creator shows strong ties with the product described. Actually it's not even the best known software with that name. See [1] vs. [2]. Pascal.Tesson 20:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Fails WP:CORP. Charlie 20:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - not notable enough to pass WP:SOFTWAREJayden54 21:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.