Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Zogon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 22:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mount Zogon

Mount Zogon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)
Zogonia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Two very funny comic strips by Tony Mosely, unfortunately with no notability outside Dragon magazine. Have attempted to look for references without success; 14 ghits for "Tony Mosely" Zogonia for example isn't much to pick from. Marasmusine (talk) 08:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom who tagged these six months ago re notability and lack of references. There has been no improvement, no notability established and they should go away so folks stop wasting time on this. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge and Redirect to Dungeon magazine and Dragon magazine, as appropriate. These are comics published exclusively in those magazines with no notability outside of that format. Howa0082 (talk) 18:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Zogonia, Redirect Mount Zogon to it. Zogonia has had a compilation book printed by Paizo Publishing last year, in addition to its magazine appearances. Considering that only a handful of comics have ever run in Dragon Magazine, it is one of the few to ever have a printed compilation book (Neither Wormy nor Yamara managed the feat). However, I admit that while there are 3850 ghits for Zogonia, mostly from places selling the compilation, I'm having trouble finding any actual reviews from reliable sources. Maybe an article on Comics in Dragon Magazine is in order? While each one suffers notability issues, together they are stronger. --Ig8887 (talk) 10:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.