Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Grace School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It should be noted that something being a school does not make it a speedy keep candidate. --Coredesat 06:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mount Grace School

Mount Grace School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Mostly non-notable, with a pinch of patent nonsense. Hux 17:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Change my vote to Delete now that the unsourced personal comments are removed. (Note though that concern about biographies of living persons is not limited to attacks!) Just because the subject could be an encyclopedia article, doesn't mean this qualifies. If someone wants to recreate with a better quality article, with more facts and less rumor, fine. Katherine Tredwell 03:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep Attacks removed. All high schools should have an article and most do. No further discussion needed. Casperonline 18:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Why should all high schools have an article? Given that Wikipedia articles are about notability I'm struggling to see how "it's a high school" is, in and of itself, a notable thing. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a directory. -- Hux 21:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Absent any consensus, the view that all schools are notable is defensible, if unlikely to convince. A Speedy Keep vote is not appropriate, however. Delete. Eusebeus 10:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Perhaps the school is notable, but the article does not show it. The two major assertions is that there are not hidden tunnels under the school, and that they have a website. DGG (talk) 20:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, If the school was historical or had notable alumni then maybe keep, but as written and sourced remove it. Callelinea 22:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Expel with the possibility of enrollment next term—I mean, delete (without prejudice). This article ought be cut down to one sentence, since the rest is opinion, peacock words and praise, or speculation. That's way too bare of a stub to keep. Once there's a decent amount of verifiable content, though, the article can be recreated. —C.Fred (talk) 01:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. — But|seriously|folks  06:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete article sounds like it's copied from a brochure. MetsFan76 21:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.