Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motron Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 20:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Motron Software

Motron Software (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete Mostly unsourced. Only claim of notability is winning a young entrepeneur contest for a school project. --Onorem 19:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - Ok, I will get more references by the end of today (GMT) H0rru5 19:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)H0rru5
• Comment - I will be more than happy to account for some of these citations. I will even assist H0rru5 on this quest. (GMT-6) leemcd56 15:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)leemcd56
• Comment - This article has enough sources for now, but when that forum is back up, please add more sources. Close this. ChRoNiC numeral 22:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)ChRoNiC_numeral — ChRoNiC numeral (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• No sources that would be considered reliable for determining notability have been added since the AfD began. Forums are not reliable sources. --Onorem 01:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I own Motron Software and I state here and now that all of theses statements are true. There were a few mistakes, but I fixed them so you can abolish the AfD notice. Stevenup7002 13:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Stevenup7002

Please read WP:RS, WP:CORP, and WP:COI. Notability has not been established, and you are not considered a reliable source. --Onorem 13:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I was the one who experienced all of this. How can we get rid of the Afd? Stevenup7002 20:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Steven

Did you read any of the links left here or on your talk page? What you say you experienced is not verifiable. An AfD discussion generally lasts 5 days unless it's obvious one way or the other that it isn't necessary. This one may end up being relisted for more comments since it was unlisted by someone from the AfD log... --Onorem 00:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete This is not a notable company. Self-sourced information and forums are not sources that establish notability under WP:CORP. Try again when the company is public. UnitedStatesian 05:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.