The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete as copyvio. Chick Bowen 04:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Copyvio. Article is incoherent and poorly written. Orignial research suspected. No rationale for notability. soUmyaSch 08:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Marked as copyvio let it run its course over there :) —porges(talk) 08:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Bwahahahahah. - Richardcavell 12:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete (CSD A8) Copyvio less than 48 hours old. Fan1967 18:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Comment however, not from a commercial content provider. —porges(talk) 22:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.