Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorola W220

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Interested editors may wish to make more effort to source this article to prevent its relisting as it is lacking in sources - but there is no consensus to delete at this time. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 22:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Motorola W220

Motorola W220 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article for this non-notable product has been Marked for expand since July with no action and remains a few-sentence stub. The only references are a blog-style review and the manufacturer's website, re-enforcing the lack of material available to write a well-referenced article because of the product's irrelevance. -- Mikeblas 03:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Mikeblas 03:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete in the absence of substantial third-party sources. Jakew 15:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Wikipedia is lacking in coverige of Motorola products. Now we have far more articles on Pokemon characters than Motorola products. I think every mobile phone hardware platform is notable. Minor versions for diferent markets should be merged. We do not have any artilces on Motorola phones that share this hardware platform. If there are they should be merged with this article. -- Petri Krohn 04:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep the lack of sources in the article doesn't mean there aren't any. Given a bit of time I could find some--Phoenix 15 19:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a catalofg of celphones. The article lacks any coverage in independent and reliable sources, so fails [[WP:N]. Edison 21:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless the phone set some kind of sales record or tech breakthrough. Mbisanz 02:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and source better, or merge all the stubs into one article. You don't have to be the biggest or the best to be notable. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 06:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete There is no indication that this phone is notable.--JForget 23:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable phone is non-notable. 198.103.221.52 22:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge into one article about Motorola's entire cellphone line. -Toptomcat 16:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.