Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motion (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. The only main-space incoming link was unnecessary, and I removed it, leaving an orphan duplicate dab page. Deleted as a housekeeping procedure. kingboyk 02:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Motion (disambiguation)

Redundant with previously existing disambiguation page at Motion. Also, I believe equal topic disambiguation and not primary topic disambiguation is appropriate in this case because of the genericity of the term "motion", the number of articles linking to "motion" which clearly do not mean the physical sense, and similar disambiguation organization on other-language Wikipedias. —Psychonaut 01:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Kimchi.sg | talk 03:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Motion (such redirect pages are useful from time to time). TimBentley (talk) 05:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Motion. I can see people putting this in by mistake (for example, Motion (physics) accidentally links to it). Fagstein 05:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Motion. --Terence Ong 11:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect --Andy123(talk) 12:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Zero sharp 18:22, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I don't care that redirects are cheap, take a look at the what links here for the page being discussed. Five things, four of them Wiki related! The one link in Motion (physics) can easily be changed. --Fbv65edel ^{(discuss | contribs)} 21:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Motion. Wstaffor 22:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Redirect a dab page?! What, pray tell, would that achieve?! There's already a dab page and it's at Motion. I'm tempted to speedy this under CSD G6 (housekeeping). --kingboyk 02:16, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.